This was originally a twitter thread, this is a more permanent expanded version.
When support for Solaris and SPARC was removed from Java, the code that was removed fell into a number of distinct classes, not all of which are equally valuable.
Solaris platform support
First, there's the support for Solaris (and thus illumos) as an operating system (the os tree in hotspot, specifically, but there are other places in the tree that have OS-specific code), which we definitely want to retain in the illumos port of openjdk.
There really isn't much difference between Solaris and illumos from Java's point of view. We have a tiny bit of illumos-specific code in the patches, but that fact is that you can take what I've done and build it on Solaris pretty easily.
Solaris x86 cpu support
Then there's support for the x86 architecture on Solaris (and thus illumos) as a specific platform (the os_cpu tree in hotspot, specifically), which I also want to retain.
SPARC cpu support
Then there's support for SPARC systems (mostly Solaris, but it took out any other OS that wanted to support SPARC too), which I've decided to pass on (if anybody wants it, they're free to do the work, but it's too large a task for me).
With SPARC removed, the remaining platform (x86) is supported by multiple other operating systems, so the basic processor port is no longer my concern. What this means, also, is that it should be relatively straightforward to add in support for arm, for example, if we ever got to the stage where illumos gained a new hardware port.
Studio toolchain support
Then there's support for the (now legacy) Studio toolchain, which was a right pain, was a great motivator for the removal, and I can only say good riddance.
There's some junk around the fact that Studio uses different command line flags to gcc. Sometimes the code has to differ based on idiosyncracies of the Studio compiler. A larger part is the way that Studio and gcc handle inline assembler, which I've almost (but not quite) fully cleaned out.
Support for legacy Solaris versions
Then, when you look closer, there's actually bits of code to support really old Solaris versions or other components that's simply no longer relevant and it would be a good thing to get rid of all that complexity.
Some of this is complex workarounds for bugs that have long been fixed. Some things use dlopen() to handle the fact that not all releases have all the shared libraries. There are still some comments mentioning old Solaris versions that you wonder if they're still relevant.
Support for various quirks and peculiarities
Finally, there's a bunch of code to simply do weird or idiosyncratic things on Solaris just because you can, and I'm actually quite keen to rip all that out and just do things the correct and easy way. Historically, there have been certain interesting peculiarities on Solaris waiting to trip up the unwary, mostly for no good reason whatsoever.
As an example of that last one, Java contains its own implementation of the way that Solaris falls back on the NIS/NIS+ domain for dns searches, and even looks for LOCALDOMAIN in the environment. Oh dear. I've eradicated that.
Another example is that there's still quite a lot of font handling code that's specifically referencing /usr/openwin, and has interesting knowledge of bugs in the OpenWindows font files.
Something I ought to look at is the way that printing is handled. Java thinks SunOS is SYS5 from the point of view of printing, which (thankfully) hasn't really been the case for a very long time. In illumos the state of printing is a mess, as we have a bunch of legacy support built in, while ideally we would just move to CUPS.
I'm also wondering whether to remove DTrace. I haven't seen it working for a while, the native DTrace in Java was always a bit problematic (the performance hit was massive and quite discouraging), and I've always disabled it in my builds.
Together, eliminating these peculiarities reduces the size of the port, makes it easier to maintain (because I don't have to keep fixing the patches as the source changes for other reasons), and makes the Java behaviour consistent with other platforms rather than being needlessly different - after all, Java is supposed to be cross-platform.
Please, keep dtrace and JSDT!
Its one of the biggest reasons for me to dream of running java 17 on Illumos.
I spent quite some time at Sun testing JSDT and was really frustrated that the probes were never added to major java parts of JDK. One reason was that there's a limitation of 16 dtrace providers per process, but that's configurable and probably could be fixed in the OS.
Post a Comment